Individual Accountability and the National Debt Burden

Food for Thought

Individual Accountability and the National Debt Burden

"I place economy among the first and most important

virtues, and public debt as the greatest of dangers

to be feared ... To preserve our independence, we

must not let our rulers load us with perpetual debt".

Thomas Jefferson 

Is it 35, or is it 37 trillion dollars of national debt which we will have following the next debt ceiling escalation? It is hard to keep track. The so-called “unfunded obligations” are measured in tens of trillions of dollars when state and municipal profligacy is factored in.  These are not accidental calamities but underhanded, back-door scrounging of national vitality. It’s useless to search for smoking guns; we are all to blame to some degree. It is the system that has failed; it has moved our population from abundance to complacency and dependence.  Unions and associations concentrate political power and compel legislators to give their members even more entitlements.  Citizens cry for more benefits while lamenting the crushing national debt. Political leaders struggle to balance patriotism against electoral reality.

People will not voluntarily give back excessive benefits, however undeserved, and pending congressional compromise over the method of fiscal suicide is no consolation.  The “sine qua non” element is constitutional amendments.  Universal respect for our constitution has been the essence of our national success, and it is the key to our future survival.  Two specific constitutional amendments, “sanity amendments,” are desperately needed: a balanced budget amendment and a national debt repayment amendment.  A balanced budget amendment would coerce partisans into sharing the dreadful but unavoidable national pain. Our country’s predicament is comparable to a recent movie called “127 Hours,” where a hiker gets one arm trapped by a fallen rock and is ultimately forced to cut off his own arm to survive.

Social Security and Medicare personal entitlements are the main drivers of our relentless national deficit spending. Every citizen expects to get what they pay for, and rightfully so. 

However, retired Americans often misunderstand that the Social Security and Medicare benefits they now enjoy correspond to their previous contributions. In most instances, they receive many times more benefits than what they put into the system.  Only those in real need should continue to receive government charity within a new Social Care Program.

Let’s begin by reporting a fair and honest accounting of every citizen’s contribution to the Social Security and Medicare entitlement programs. Let every person know what they put in, what a fair interest in that money has produced for them, and the total amount that in justice belongs to them. Let’s clearly pinpoint the end of everyone’s rightful compensation and the beginning of social charity. No person in need should be abandoned, but it begs the question, is anyone opposed to means-testing of deficit-financed social charity? We have to accept that not all seniors are alike; some can pay their own way, while many more can partly contribute to their own retirement and medical costs.

A debt repayment amendment is seldom mentioned, and this is a major part of the problem. Balancing the budget over several years is not enough; the devastating debt we already have will zap our economy. A constitutional amendment will accomplish two very important things: it will create a debt repayment regime and make it difficult for future legislatures to raise the national debt ceiling.  A repayment regime would have to be designed as a generational, 75-100-year amortization plan. It would also require its own dedicated, tax-based revenue stream. Future augmentation of the national debt would not result from a painless stroke of the pen but from a corresponding increase in very public mandatory taxes.

A final consideration for fiscal responsibility is the need to prepare for massive national spending on domestic issues like failing schools, illegal immigration, overcrowded prisons, energy dependence, crumbling infrastructure …, as well as possible expenditures for international issues like a pending space race with China, growing military and humanitarian involvement in developing Arab revolutions, possible escalation of our war on terror … As a society, we can and have practice “surrender management,” it is the inevitable result of a refusal to sacrifice.  Immunity from sacrifice is not an American entitlement.

Visit my website at www.CarlosArce.net

Visit my blog at American Analysis (carloslarce.blogspot.com)    

Purchase my books at Amazon.com : Carlos L. Arce

Purchase my art at www.TheStatuette.com

Use my Real Estate Service at www.FindaFloridaHome.com