From the Politics of Personal Destruction to Reasonable Compromise: #1 Undocumented Immigration

From the Politics of Personal Destruction to Reasonable Compromise:

#1 Undocumented Immigration

Update to Article Published here on July 29, 2016

It is unfortunate that candidates for president concentrate their statements on character attacks of their opponents and polarized and intransigent policy positions.  I believe that candidates themselves would better serve the public by presenting proposals for viable compromises on the issues that have lingered in the limbo of inaction and gridlock.  Surrogates and the media will take care of the personal destruction part.  May I humbly propose here in my blog, and probably simply repackage the thinking of many others, a series of what I consider reasonable compromises.

Modern-day undocumented immigration has been a divisive issue for as long as I can remember; I have been around for a while.  In the 50s and 60s, the exploitation and mistreatment of "braceros," cheap manual laborers imported across the Mexican border by American farmers, became a national scandal.  Cesar Chavez, a Mexican American labor leader, founded the United Farm Workers Union in 1962.  His struggle gained national attention and the active support of political figures the likes of Robert F. Kennedy.  Over the years, the illegal employment of undocumented aliens by American industry, as well as households, has created a magnet for border crossers in search of a better life.  As the population of illegal immigrants grew, Congress granted a series of seven amnesties as follows:

     1.       Immigration and Reform Control Act (IRCA), 1986

1         2.       Section 245(i) Amnesty, 1994

           3.        Section 245(i) Extension Amnesty, 1997

           4.        Nicaraguan Adjustment and Central American Relief Act (NACARA) Amnesty, 1997

           5.        Haitian Refugee Immigration Fairness Act Amnesty (HRIFA), 1998

           6.        Late Amnesty, 2000

           7.        LIFE Act Amnesty, 2000

In total, these amnesties were accompanied by promises from congressional progressives of future border enforcement; after each amnesty, the commitment to border enforcement never materialized.  These amnesties provided legal status to more than six million illegal aliens.  In the past 20 years, the undocumented population has accumulated again, but this time estimated at more than 20 million people.  Calls for amnesty number eight have divided the nation.  Democrats want Hispanic immigrants to come and vote but not to take jobs from their union supporters, while Republicans want them to come and work cheaply but not to increase the democratic voting bloc.  The hypocrisy goes on at the expense of those who are forced to live in the shadows.

Today, an argument on the "left" is that the millions of undocumented immigrants already in the U.S.  have contributed to our economy and deserve some form of legalization and not the cruel separation of individuals from their families, ergo amnesty number eight.  The idea of a global society without borders, as John Lennon sang, is something that we can indeed “Imagine.”

An argument on the "right" is that immigrants from the same language and cultural similarity are arriving in indigestible numbers and are overwhelming our natural "social assimilation machine."  That wave of Spanish-speaking border crossers has led to national Spanish-language television networks and a demand for a bi-lingual society.  It is further argued that what our country needs is a more language and culturally diversified immigrant population, as well as more educated immigrants that are in short supply for our economy, not more unskilled laborers to compete with the ones we already have.

Without taking sides let's consider a simple compromise as follows:

 For the "Right."
 

•         Provide the Border Patrol and the Immigration Control and Enforcement Agency (ICE) with whatever resources are needed to secure the Mexican-American border verifiably.
•      Provide ICE with whatever resources are needed to pursue and deport all those who overstay their "visa period."
•      Create a mandatory national electronic verification for employment system and provide ICE with whatever resources are needed to detect and substantially fine employers of                        undocumented immigrants
•      Prioritize future immigration to favor those with the skills needed by our economy and who can support themselves after they arrive.

  For the "Left."

•      Suspend deportation of undocumented immigrants without a criminal record.
•      Provide a grace period for undocumented immigrants in the country to register with the government for legal status and provide resources for a community-based registration system.
•      Reform the process that keeps applicants for legal entry waiting for many months and even years so that it can be a quick and efficient experience for future Americans.
•      Create government incentives for American businesses to shift their supply chain production from China to Mexico, Central and South America, and the Caribbean nations.  Thereby            reducing unemployment in our regional neighborhood and the need for those populations to      emigrate

The trick to the compromise is that it all needs to be approved and funded simultaneously, without new empty promises of future compliance.  This compromise is simple and obvious; if both sides act in good faith, it leads to gridlock when one side or the other tries to cheat.  The big losers are always the undocumented immigrants now in the country and the country itself.

Visit my website at www.CarlosArce.net

Visit my blog at American Analysis (carloslarce.blogspot.com)    

Purchase my books at Amazon.com : Carlos L. Arce

Purchase my art at www.TheStatuette.com

Use my Real Estate Service at www.FindaFloridaHome.com